GRT — the Great Reporting Tool 159 Networks tool

Reporting your team can actually use.

GRT turns the data your business already generates into reporting you can act on — without the spreadsheet sprawl, the one-off scripts, or the quarter-long BI project.

What it is

A governed reporting engine, not another extract.

Most reporting platforms depend on a publish-an-extract cycle: a question arrives, a ticket opens, an extract is rebuilt and republished, and the answer lands two to three weeks later — already slightly wrong. GRT reads your sources directly, read-only and audited, so a new question is a conversation rather than a queue.

The data plane

No model touches your data.

Every query is validated to a single read-only statement before it reaches the database. Writes and DDL throw before execution. Connections run under least-privilege logins, scope-gated, tenant-isolated, fully audited.

The layer above

Your Claude, not our key.

GRT publishes tools, prompts, and a progressive schema resource, so the caller's own Claude discovers real tables and joins before composing a query. It never guesses a column name, and the server never ships row data to a model it does not control.

The proof · a shipped engagement

From a three-week report queue to a conversation.

We documented a complex ERP estate, rebuilt every production dashboard, and shipped a governed reporting engine. Every figure below is drawn from commit history, build telemetry, or migration ledgers. Nothing is projected or estimated.

2,498

database assets auto-documented before a line of report code

716

calculated fields reverse-engineered from the incumbent platform

24 / 24

dashboards rebuilt as live HTML, in about three days

755

of 1,005 engine commits co-authored with Claude Code

$33.02

for one metered 33-agent build workflow, at published API rates

282

guard scripts enforcing the security contract on every build

The problem

The bottleneck was never the database.

Mid-market companies already own their data. What they do not own is the loop that turns a question into a report. The incumbent platform's published data sources actually stripped fields that existed in the customer's own database — users were getting less analytical surface than their ERP contained.

Act one

Every dashboard, rebuilt live, in days.

Agents documented the estate first — tables, views, triggers, relationships — into an atlas an agent can traverse without guessing a column name. Then 24 of 24 production dashboards were re-implemented as live HTML on direct, read-only SQL. No extracts, no republish cycle, no copy of the data to keep in sync.

Act two

What the extracts had hidden.

The rebuild surfaced findings the incumbent's dashboards had never shown: eight figures of revenue accumulating under a placeholder salesperson record, a budget line frozen at the same value for twelve consecutive years, and dozens of deals marked closed-won after their expected close date.

Read the full case study

Including how two Claude agents negotiated the GRT–Cerberus integration in versioned design memos, and where Claude sits across the stack.

Where it fits

On its own, or inside Cerberus.

GRT is the focused entry point: every company needs dependable reporting. When the work grows past reporting, GRT registers as a plugin behind Cerberus, our orchestration platform, so it sits behind the same control plane as the rest of your stack.

GRTFocused product
CerberusBroader platform

Next step

Your data already answers these questions.

If your reporting still moves at the speed of a ticket queue, thirty minutes is step one. Walkthrough, pricing, or a tailored deployment — we would rather show you than spec it out on a page.